From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: 103376,93a8020cc980d113
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: What is wrong with Ada?
References: <1176150704.130880.248080@l77g2000hsb.googlegroups.com>
 <sa4slb9dnqe.fsf@margay.local>
 <1176169724.087077.237410@w1g2000hsg.googlegroups.com>
 <tkejmsgtsq.fsf@hod.lan.m-e-leypold.de> <evgn3p$des$1@jacob-sparre.dk>
 <tairc4km9k.fsf@hod.lan.m-e-leypold.de> <evk1ai$7as$1@jacob-sparre.dk>
From: Markus E Leypold
 <development-2006-8ecbb5cc8aREMOVETHIS@ANDTHATm-e-leypold.de>
Organization: N/A
Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2007 15:02:19 +0200
Message-ID: <pgzm5dagpw.fsf@hod.lan.m-e-leypold.de>
User-Agent: Some cool user agent (SCUG)
Cancel-Lock: sha1:VPi0xibNr0h81FiGYfBjl/ChkA8=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
NNTP-Posting-Host: 88.72.204.82
X-Trace: news.arcor-ip.de 1176382496 88.72.204.82 (12 Apr 2007 14:54:56 +0200)
X-Complaints-To: abuse@arcor-ip.de
Path: 
 g2news1.google.com!news3.google.com!news.germany.com!news.unit0.net!newsfeed.arcor-ip.de!news.arcor-ip.de!not-for-mail
Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:14931
Date: 2007-04-12T15:02:19+02:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>


"Randy Brukardt" <randy@rrsoftware.com> writes:

> "Markus E Leypold"
> <development-2006-8ecbb5cc8aREMOVETHIS@ANDTHATm-e-leypold.de> wrote in
> message news:tairc4km9k.fsf@hod.lan.m-e-leypold.de...
> ...
>> Randy -- I should ask that in a personal mail, but since it is also of
>> interest at least to new comers in this group (and the Ada vendor FAQ
>> doesn't exist any more?):
>>
>> Does Janus Ada run / work with Linux? I see a version for 386 Unix,
>> but that seems to be for Interactive, SCO and friends: Something I
>> haven't seen for some time any more. Is there a Linux version planned?
>
> We don't have a Linux version at this time. My guess is that it wouldn't be
> particularly difficult to port the old Unix version, but at lot of things
> that seem "not too hard" have a way of taking a lot more time than expected.

That effect I know. :-).

> It's on the roadmap but isn't scheduled for now. 

Good to hear (but not see me as a merket at the moment).

> (Demand could change that, of course.)

Of course demand only grows when there is a product offering ;-).