From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 Path: eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Simon Clubley Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Why are Ada compilers difficult to write ? Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2018 17:24:02 -0000 (UTC) Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Message-ID: References: <584564c2-9f64-4965-b045-535cdaf899c0@googlegroups.com> <7cb22c58-3009-47f0-8fe7-62f3cd61785d@googlegroups.com> <50ab294a-9bd5-4005-be6d-3c359f817b59@googlegroups.com> Injection-Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2018 17:24:02 -0000 (UTC) Injection-Info: reader02.eternal-september.org; posting-host="4d1086449d7be45801aa9e885b35254f"; logging-data="20095"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/57pANr46Z/lg4FSYcCDInQNN8aJbr/nA=" User-Agent: slrn/0.9.8.1 (VMS/Multinet) Cancel-Lock: sha1:BUSVaX21s5Rnr3GIKTUNqDw8y+o= Xref: reader02.eternal-september.org comp.lang.ada:53307 Date: 2018-06-25T17:24:02+00:00 List-Id: On 2018-06-25, Lucretia wrote: > On Monday, 25 June 2018 06:48:57 UTC+1, Simon Clubley wrote: > >> > Thanks, but I found it in the index, it's actually labelled as that ;) >> > >> >> Is that the AARM ? >> >> It's not in the Ada 95 paper LRM I have or a PDF copy of the Ada 2012 LRM. > > http://www.ada-auth.org/standards/aarm12_w_tc1/html/AA-0-5.html > > "accessibility rules > See also Heart of Darkness 3.10.2(3.b/3)" > Thanks; I just use the normal LRM when writing Ada code. Perhaps I should think about switching to the AARM... Simon. -- Simon Clubley, clubley@remove_me.eisner.decus.org-Earth.UFP Microsoft: Bringing you 1980s technology to a 21st century world