From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,LOTS_OF_MONEY
	autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,be23df8e7e275d73
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2001-07-10 02:19:39 PST
Path: 
 archiver1.google.com!newsfeed.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!news-spur1.maxwell.syr.edu!news.maxwell.syr.edu!newsfeed.cwix.com!sjc-peer.news.verio.net!news.verio.net!iad-read.news.verio.net.POSTED!kilgallen
From: Kilgallen@eisner.decus.org.nospam (Larry Kilgallen)
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: "is ada dead?" A challenge for all of us?
Message-ID: <pfK4KEvcQH+Y@eisner.encompasserve.org>
References: <mailman.994606630.15710.comp.lang.ada@ada.eu.org>
 <f8827.179501$DG1.30031868@news1.rdc1.mi.home.com>
 <LHt27.323181$p33.6527095@news1.sttls1.wa.home.com>
Organization: LJK Software
Date: 10 Jul 2001 05:19:32 -0500
NNTP-Posting-Host: 216.44.122.34
X-Complaints-To: abuse@verio.net
X-Trace: iad-read.news.verio.net 994756775 216.44.122.34 (Tue,
 10 Jul 2001 09:19:35 GMT)
NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2001 09:19:35 GMT
Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:9708
Date: 2001-07-10T05:19:32-05:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

In article <LHt27.323181$p33.6527095@news1.sttls1.wa.home.com>, "DuckE" <nospam_steved94@home.com> writes:

> This would be especially profound if the application you clone is
> notoriously buggy and you provide a solid version.

The effect would be even more profound if the Ada replacement is buggy.