From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 Path: eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: "Alejandro R. Mosteo" Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Header-only Ada libraries... Date: Tue, 5 Jun 2018 14:31:53 +0200 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Message-ID: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Date: Tue, 5 Jun 2018 12:31:54 -0000 (UTC) Injection-Info: reader02.eternal-september.org; posting-host="0e018639468612ef92897b37c21500c4"; logging-data="30790"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19NSWSgeyUQgJh8+d84Rzst" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.8.0 Cancel-Lock: sha1:q3eCaH2TcYKmJO86l0zNExdP05w= In-Reply-To: Content-Language: en-US Xref: reader02.eternal-september.org comp.lang.ada:52944 Date: 2018-06-05T14:31:53+02:00 List-Id: On 31/05/2018 15:35, Jeffrey R. Carter wrote: > On 05/31/2018 01:14 PM, Alejandro R. Mosteo wrote: >> A while ago I commented on how I unexpectedly found myself writing more >> and more expression functions... today I realized that this tiny >> project to interact with C subprograms is header-only: >> >> https://github.com/mosteo/cstrings/tree/master/src > > Not a header in sight. Not surprising, since Ada doesn't have headers. Being aware of the difference, it's part of the point that you can do now things in Ada specification files that weren't possible previously... and that already make some people wary.