From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 Path: eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!gandalf.srv.welterde.de!news.jacob-sparre.dk!franka.jacob-sparre.dk!pnx.dk!.POSTED.rrsoftware.com!not-for-mail From: "Randy Brukardt" Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Header-only Ada libraries... Date: Thu, 31 May 2018 17:53:33 -0500 Organization: JSA Research & Innovation Message-ID: References: Injection-Date: Thu, 31 May 2018 22:53:47 -0000 (UTC) Injection-Info: franka.jacob-sparre.dk; posting-host="rrsoftware.com:24.196.82.226"; logging-data="29289"; mail-complaints-to="news@jacob-sparre.dk" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.5931 X-RFC2646: Format=Flowed; Original X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.7246 Xref: reader02.eternal-september.org comp.lang.ada:52828 Date: 2018-05-31T17:53:33-05:00 List-Id: "Robert A Duff" wrote in message news:wcc36y7edvg.fsf@TheWorld.com... > "Jeffrey R. Carter" writes: > >> Not a header in sight. Not surprising, since Ada doesn't have headers. > > That's like saying, "French people don't eat cheese." > > Of course, they have something called "fromage", but that's got > nothing to do with the matter. I tend to agree with Jeff on this one: Ada has packages, which are a named, checked, compilation unit. C headers are just untamed (and unnamed, other than the source name) conglomerations of code that could literally contain anything - any checking or restrictions comes from the implementation. They're rather different things, even if often used for the same purpose. Randy.