From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00
	autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
Path: 
 eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: "Alejandro R. Mosteo" <alejandro@mosteo.com>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Header-only Ada libraries...
Date: Thu, 31 May 2018 13:14:11 +0200
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID: <peole4$ne4$1@dont-email.me>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Thu, 31 May 2018 11:14:12 -0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: h2725194.stratoserver.net;
 posting-host="d6a9341a58a00c79c2f55652b7e49f19";
	logging-data="24004"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";
	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1923MnqMi74KJju+FirxEwn"
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/52.8.0
Cancel-Lock: sha1:rKpC+Wo0hnRxU1NH9Wa7vbK6Me8=
Content-Language: en-US
X-Mozilla-News-Host: news://news.eternal-september.org:119
Xref: reader02.eternal-september.org comp.lang.ada:52804
Date: 2018-05-31T13:14:11+02:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

A while ago I commented on how I unexpectedly found myself writing more 
and more expression functions... today I realized that this tiny project 
to interact with C subprograms is header-only:

https://github.com/mosteo/cstrings/tree/master/src

What it does isn't important, but I couldn't but think of the trend in 
the C++ world to go for header-only libraries.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Header-only

Anyway, just a curiosity... and something to worry about? ;)

Alex.