From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 Path: eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!nntp-feed.chiark.greenend.org.uk!ewrotcd!newsfeed.xs3.de!io.xs3.de!news.jacob-sparre.dk!franka.jacob-sparre.dk!pnx.dk!.POSTED.rrsoftware.com!not-for-mail From: "Randy Brukardt" Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Strings with discriminated records Date: Wed, 30 May 2018 15:11:23 -0500 Organization: JSA Research & Innovation Message-ID: References: <55ce14eb-6b83-4ea0-a550-f9e1410d0b06@googlegroups.com> <704ab1a8-c954-460e-81e7-05c64fcfaba4@googlegroups.com> <71501ba6-766e-45df-927b-0ed908fba28e@googlegroups.com> Injection-Date: Wed, 30 May 2018 20:11:35 -0000 (UTC) Injection-Info: franka.jacob-sparre.dk; posting-host="rrsoftware.com:24.196.82.226"; logging-data="2694"; mail-complaints-to="news@jacob-sparre.dk" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.5931 X-RFC2646: Format=Flowed; Response X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.7246 Xref: reader02.eternal-september.org comp.lang.ada:52794 Date: 2018-05-30T15:11:23-05:00 List-Id: "Dmitry A. Kazakov" wrote in message news:peljsm$q5i$1@gioia.aioe.org... > On 2018-05-30 12:31 AM, Randy Brukardt wrote: >> "Dmitry A. Kazakov" wrote in message >> news:peegke$rt1$1@gioia.aioe.org... >> ... >>> as a poor-man solution to supertyping. I.e. if it were possible to make >>> Message a subtype of String (by providing conversions), you could simply >>> write: >>> >>> M : Message := "Hello World"; >> >> Or you could just give string literals to type Message (although you'll >> have >> to wait a bit for that capability -- but it should be in Ada 2020 - >> finally). > > Yes, I heard about use-defined literals, I am glad they made into Ada. > > However subtyping per conversions is a more general approach which would > work for literals too as it does with universal types. Yes, but it's never gotten any traction. I've never been able to get any interest in any sort of user-defined conversion - there is a large faction that thinks function calls are good enough for that. Randy.