From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,36cc6b79786b2ccc
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: aaro@iki.fi (Aaro Koskinen)
Subject: Re: Ada question (defining types)
Date: 2000/08/17
Message-ID: <pdxem3o80ma.fsf@vesuri.Helsinki.FI>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 659333610
References: <8ngoog$f5e$1@news.uit.no>
X-Complaints-To: usenet@news.helsinki.fi
X-Trace: oravannahka.helsinki.fi 966519773 23892 128.214.205.10 (17 Aug 2000
 13:42:53 GMT)
Organization: University of Helsinki
NNTP-Posting-Date: 17 Aug 2000 13:42:53 GMT
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: 2000-08-17T13:42:53+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

reinert@ola.npolar.no (Reinert Korsnes) writes:
> Is it possible to make the following more compact and relyable
> (less typo/error prone):
[...]
>  Longs : constant array ( Long_I ) of Integer :=
>              (  0,  5, 10, 15, 20, 25, 30, 35, 40, 45, 50,
[...]
>               300,305,310,315,320,325,330,335,340,345,350,355);

Implement it using a function instead of an array.

-- 
Aaro Koskinen, aaro@iki.fi, http://www.iki.fi/aaro