From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00
	autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
Path: 
 eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!gandalf.srv.welterde.de!news.jacob-sparre.dk!franka.jacob-sparre.dk!pnx.dk!.POSTED.rrsoftware.com!not-for-mail
From: "Randy Brukardt" <randy@rrsoftware.com>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: meaningfully/compellingly "advertising" Ada on StackOverflow
Date: Fri, 18 May 2018 15:49:15 -0500
Organization: JSA Research & Innovation
Message-ID: <pdne8b$32o$1@franka.jacob-sparre.dk>
References: <6420bab2-0aef-4d36-b978-525e4de45e7e@googlegroups.com>
 <aed23075-1271-4e2c-b5f2-8da705e1a73e@googlegroups.com>
 <a86dc533-a8f5-4d1c-9b4c-11d7963c6d15@googlegroups.com>
 <pdkrvk$n53$1@franka.jacob-sparre.dk>
 <1559505943.548291689.457576.laguest-archeia.com@nntp.aioe.org>
 <87fu2psqpj.fsf@nightsong.com>
 <300fd624-72a0-4171-90dc-49ad5df4fa21@googlegroups.com>
 <c18f41b4-37c1-4fda-8880-b9b3f457918d@googlegroups.com>
 <877eo1shlv.fsf@nightsong.com>
 <9620309c-8abc-4ff2-b631-73bbc72ee5d4@googlegroups.com>
 <12f81e06-6fb0-49c9-9c6a-ed2615e96d32@googlegroups.com>
Injection-Date: Fri, 18 May 2018 20:49:15 -0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: franka.jacob-sparre.dk;
 posting-host="rrsoftware.com:24.196.82.226";
	logging-data="3160"; mail-complaints-to="news@jacob-sparre.dk"
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.5931
X-RFC2646: Format=Flowed; Original
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.7246
Xref: reader02.eternal-september.org comp.lang.ada:52443
Date: 2018-05-18T15:49:15-05:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

"John Perry" <john.perry@usm.edu> wrote in message 
news:12f81e06-6fb0-49c9-9c6a-ed2615e96d32@googlegroups.com...
...
>2) The instruction have the -gnatp option, which I think disables
>some checks. I used that at one point to see if it would speed up
> the code, and I thought it did, but I think it actually didn't in the
>end. So that could be removed; I actually tried experimenting with
>various pragmas to improve timing, without success.

If checks are suppressed (including "container_check" for GNAT), I'd expect 
the containers be roughly the same performance as a hand-written list or 
tree. But you'd have to try it to be sure.

                      Randy.