From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 Path: eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: "Jeffrey R. Carter" Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Why not Coq2Ada program extraction? Date: Tue, 1 May 2018 10:21:38 +0200 Organization: Also freenews.netfront.net; news.tornevall.net; news.eternal-september.org Message-ID: References: <7b6ae5e8-6604-4d36-b606-ead71f667847@googlegroups.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Date: Tue, 1 May 2018 08:21:38 -0000 (UTC) Injection-Info: reader02.eternal-september.org; posting-host="376cadd70f7969b7b1ab2770cc95c392"; logging-data="25919"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19XGB4e3yrlb41N5qy77GAjq6yjHchW05c=" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.7.0 In-Reply-To: <7b6ae5e8-6604-4d36-b606-ead71f667847@googlegroups.com> Content-Language: en-US Cancel-Lock: sha1:9MWiWuCbzOtZsVS4gzLnjxah114= Xref: reader02.eternal-september.org comp.lang.ada:51874 Date: 2018-05-01T10:21:38+02:00 List-Id: On 05/01/2018 05:38 AM, Dan'l Miller wrote: > > Why hasn't anyone ever developed Ada extraction from Coq proofs? Perhaps the coq2rust work-in-progress can serve as a guide and/or inspiration for an analogous coq2ada. Sounds interesting. When do you expect to have it finished? -- Jeff Carter "My little plum, I am like Robin Hood. I take from the rich, and I give to the poor. ... Us poor." Poppy 96