From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 Path: eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!aioe.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: "Dmitry A. Kazakov" Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Using the "Terminated" aspect for a task passed to a generic Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2018 18:41:57 +0200 Organization: Aioe.org NNTP Server Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: kQkuQcRDy1QFvWpyB1foYw.user.gioia.aioe.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Complaints-To: abuse@aioe.org User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.7.0 Content-Language: en-US X-Notice: Filtered by postfilter v. 0.8.3 Xref: reader02.eternal-september.org comp.lang.ada:51681 Date: 2018-04-23T18:41:57+02:00 List-Id: On 2018-04-23 18:35, Dan'l Miller wrote: > On Monday, April 23, 2018 at 9:20:33 AM UTC-5, NiGHTS wrote: >> Having looked carefully through 2 Ada reference books, one dedicated to tasking, and using Google to no end, I am stumped on the following Ada dilemma. >> >> generic >> >> type Managed_Task_Type is limited private; > > Wait. Why can't we write: > > generic > type Managed_Task_Type is limited task interface; > package WD is > ... > > as per 12.5.5's AI95-00345 example in the _AARM:2012TC1_ page 527 (given there without the “limited”)? Because you could not declare an object out of the interface, which seems to be a requirement. -- Regards, Dmitry A. Kazakov http://www.dmitry-kazakov.de