From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 Path: eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!aioe.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: "Dmitry A. Kazakov" Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Finalization of library level tasks Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2018 16:12:30 +0200 Organization: Aioe.org NNTP Server Message-ID: References: <702e2422-a93f-4200-9749-5122c3d0f899@googlegroups.com> <04f19a56-7fab-416e-8ec0-b9a73e239e90@googlegroups.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: MyFhHs417jM9AgzRpXn7yg.user.gioia.aioe.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Complaints-To: abuse@aioe.org User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.7.0 X-Notice: Filtered by postfilter v. 0.8.3 Content-Language: en-US Xref: reader02.eternal-september.org comp.lang.ada:51592 Date: 2018-04-18T16:12:30+02:00 List-Id: On 18/04/2018 15:51, J-P. Rosen wrote: > Le 18/04/2018 à 14:25, Dmitry A. Kazakov a écrit : >> Sorry, but it does not work at all, because there is no any way to >> terminate task. If intended task termination has race condition, uses >> arbitrary dependencies between unrelated tasks, ignores stated >> dependencies, e.g. between the packages, deadlocks in finalization, then >> there must be something wrong with the intention. > It has not, or your termination conditions call for a higher protocol. > All your suggestions are undecidable; please provide an example of the > problem. Problem: A worker task encapsulated into an object. The task does some calculations or some I/O in chunks. The task's activity is not induced by other tasks. When the object finalizes the task must go with it. Nothing more. In pseudo-code: task body Worker is begin while the object lives loop do some chunk of work end loop; end Worker; P.S. I posted an example in a separate thread. The posted solution should work except the cases when the access type is at the same level as the object and both are below the library level. -- Regards, Dmitry A. Kazakov http://www.dmitry-kazakov.de