From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: 103376,aef4913dd6741a38
X-Google-Thread: 113ae9,aef4913dd6741a38
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,gid113ae9,public
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
Path: 
 g2news1.google.com!news3.google.com!news.glorb.com!newsfeed2.telusplanet.net!newsfeed.telusplanet.net!newsfeed.telus.net!clgrps12.POSTED!53ab2750!not-for-mail
From: HansF <News.Hans@telus.net>
Subject: Re: ADA vs Java
User-Agent: Pan/0.14.2.92 ('Ere, he says he's not dead.)
Message-Id: <pan.2005.06.21.17.11.28.679385@telus.net>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada,comp.lang.java.help
References: <bllse.12013$q46.11010@newsfe1-win.ntli.net>
 <d8sokd$mka$1@news1brm.Central.Sun.COM> <uis0cdqez.fsf@obry.net>
 <pan.2005.06.18.11.20.22.386912@spacetime.de> <u8y17eoyb.fsf@obry.net>
 <pan.2005.06.18.21.43.42.515021@telus.net> <uoea2u9t1.fsf@obry.net>
 <pan.2005.06.19.22.22.32.110658@telus.net> <uhdfttuad.fsf@obry.net>
 <pan.2005.06.20.22.34.52.955118@telus.net> <u8y13u056.fsf@obry.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2005 17:08:21 GMT
NNTP-Posting-Host: 161.184.143.86
X-Trace: clgrps12 1119373701 161.184.143.86 (Tue, 21 Jun 2005 11:08:21 MDT)
NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2005 11:08:21 MDT
Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:11533 comp.lang.java.help:17825
Date: 2005-06-21T17:08:21+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

On Tue, 21 Jun 2005 18:48:05 +0200, Pascal Obry interested us by writing:

> 
> 
> No you missed an important point in one of my previous message. In Ada, for

Didn't miss it.  You apparently missed my points though.

> safety critical softwares, one will use a certified runtime or no runtime at
> all. Also in safety critical applications only a subset of Ada is used (there

Q: So, why would a person not use the full Ada in a safety critical
application?  

A? I assume that some document makes a statement like 'only the following
features/environment/capabilities/constructs/whatever are approved for
safety critical applications'.  

If true, that imposes limits and is equivalent to a disclaimer about using
the full capability of Ada in such environments - just not written by
lawyers.

(We've used up way too much bandwidth in this non-Ada group.  Final
word is yours - I hereby refrain from further responses.)

-- 
Hans Forbrich