From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: 103376,aef4913dd6741a38 X-Google-Thread: 113ae9,aef4913dd6741a38 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,gid113ae9,public X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: g2news1.google.com!news4.google.com!news.glorb.com!newsfeed2.telusplanet.net!newsfeed.telus.net!edtnps90.POSTED!53ab2750!not-for-mail From: HansF Subject: Re: ADA vs Java User-Agent: Pan/0.14.2.92 ('Ere, he says he's not dead.) Message-Id: Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada,comp.lang.java.help References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Date: Sun, 19 Jun 2005 22:19:27 GMT NNTP-Posting-Host: 161.184.143.86 X-Trace: edtnps90 1119219567 161.184.143.86 (Sun, 19 Jun 2005 16:19:27 MDT) NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 19 Jun 2005 16:19:27 MDT Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:11485 comp.lang.java.help:17755 Date: 2005-06-19T22:19:27+00:00 List-Id: On Sun, 19 Jun 2005 08:42:34 +0200, Pascal Obry interested us by writing: > > Building safety-critrical software is possible in Ada and no Ada vendor will > have such disclamer (Ada is used in the most critical application around). The > point is that Ada can be used with a certified runtime or no runtime at all > in some implementation. > > Pascal. No doubt Ada is solid. Little wonder that Oracle's PL/SQL is based on Ada. In my opinion, based on my experience, Ada will tend to be used in a professional environment tht includes proper analysis, specification and testing. As such, the attitude in an Ada environment may be as much or more important to critical programming than the fact that it is a solid piece of technology. But you do not answer the question, which is (rephrased): "Are you implying that there are no bugs in any Ada compiler?". (If you answer yes, the next obvious question is - what is the proof. However, I will not ask that question! ) -- Hans Forbrich