From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: 103376,aef4913dd6741a38 X-Google-Thread: 113ae9,aef4913dd6741a38 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,gid113ae9,public X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: g2news1.google.com!news3.google.com!news.glorb.com!newsfeed2.telusplanet.net!newsfeed.telus.net!edtnps84.POSTED!53ab2750!not-for-mail From: HansF Subject: Re: ADA vs Java User-Agent: Pan/0.14.2.92 ('Ere, he says he's not dead.) Message-Id: Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada,comp.lang.java.help References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Date: Sat, 18 Jun 2005 21:40:38 GMT NNTP-Posting-Host: 161.184.143.86 X-Trace: edtnps84 1119130838 161.184.143.86 (Sat, 18 Jun 2005 15:40:38 MDT) NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 18 Jun 2005 15:40:38 MDT Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:11474 comp.lang.java.help:17739 Date: 2005-06-18T21:40:38+00:00 List-Id: On Sat, 18 Jun 2005 16:09:48 +0200, Pascal Obry interested us by writing: > > Stefan Schulz writes: > >> It merely means that they want to be absolutely positively sure that noone >> will sue them over a bug in the compiler. IIRC, you will find a similar > ^^^^^ > > Exactly my point, thanks. Are you implying that no Ada compiler has any bugs? -- Hans Forbrich