From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: 103376,860efd11d835e2ae X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: g2news1.google.com!news4.google.com!news.glorb.com!news.alt.net!pd7cy2so!shaw.ca!pd7tw2no.POSTED!53ab2750!not-for-mail X-Trace-PostClient-IP: 24.85.39.20 From: u_int32_t Subject: Re: Communication between Ada and Java through named pipes User-Agent: Pan/0.14.2 (This is not a psychotic episode. It's a cleansing moment of clarity.) Message-Id: Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada References: <41c5af48$0$25070$ba620e4c@news.skynet.be> X-coolness-factor: 100% MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Date: Sun, 19 Dec 2004 18:18:35 GMT NNTP-Posting-Host: 64.59.144.75 X-Complaints-To: abuse@shaw.ca X-Trace: pd7tw2no 1103480315 64.59.144.75 (Sun, 19 Dec 2004 11:18:35 MST) NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 19 Dec 2004 11:18:35 MST Organization: Shaw Residential Internet Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:7079 Date: 2004-12-19T18:18:35+00:00 List-Id: On Sun, 19 Dec 2004 17:43:48 +0100, Adrien Plisson wrote: > i never used named pipes, but i used shared memory once to communicate > straight between VB and C++. ultra platform specific, but extremely > efficient... I believe VB is ultra platform specific :)