From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: 103376,5f4679d58bde270f
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
Path: 
 g2news1.google.com!news4.google.com!news.glorb.com!news-in.ntli.net!newsrout1-win.ntli.net!ntli.net!peer-uk.news.demon.net!kibo.news.demon.net!news.demon.co.uk!demon!not-for-mail
From: "Luke A. Guest" <laguest@n_o_p_o_r_k_a_n_d_h_a_m.abyss2.demon.co.uk>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Calling C++ methods from Ada..
Date: Fri, 03 Dec 2004 14:06:00 +0000
Message-ID: 
 <pan.2004.12.03.14.06.00.743648@n_o_p_o_r_k_a_n_d_h_a_m.abyss2.demon.co.uk>
References: <e8f9995c.0412011311.754046da@posting.google.com>
 <pan.2004.12.01.23.05.04.344825@n_o_p_o_r_k_a_n_d_h_a_m.abyss2.demon.co.uk>
 <sa4pt1tkl8c.fsf@snoopy.apana.org.au>
 <pan.2004.12.02.21.32.00.755036@n_o_p_o_r_k_a_n_d_h_a_m.abyss2.demon.co.uk>
 <12249392.8B9d8fV5qk@linux1.krischik.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: abyss2.demon.co.uk
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Trace: news.demon.co.uk 1102082760 27080 62.49.62.197 (3 Dec 2004 14:06:00
 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: abuse@demon.net
NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 3 Dec 2004 14:06:00 +0000 (UTC)
User-Agent: Pan/0.14.2 (This is not a psychotic episode. It's a cleansing
 moment of clarity.)
Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:6737
Date: 2004-12-03T14:06:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

On Fri, 03 Dec 2004 09:59:22 +0100, Martin Krischik wrote:

> The original idea was a C++ parser which generated the bindings. With the
> complexity of C++ the only way to go. However the parser never
> happend :-( .

I wonder how much work it would be to add a switch to the GCC C++ compiler
to enable generation of GNAT bindings (when --languages has ada passed on
the configuration command line)?

Luke.