From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: 103376,575dfcf6488662de X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII Path: g2news1.google.com!news1.google.com!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!not-for-mail From: Thomas Lotze Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Libraries written in Ada Date: Mon, 22 Nov 2004 22:45:48 +0100 Message-ID: References: <18687975.p80OmDsB1I@linux1.krischik.com> <1464020.dFWPVBaaRG@linux1.krischik.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: news.uni-berlin.de pr74XxeLdUDpOmba91uqOAIBcsS6ITalz/HatD3ajnBDT+e4U9 User-Agent: Pan/0.14.2.91 (As She Crawled Across the Table (Debian GNU/Linux)) Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:6340 Date: 2004-11-22T22:45:48+01:00 List-Id: On Mon, 22 Nov 2004 21:25:08 +0000, Georg Bauhaus wrote: > While it is possible to write Ada programs that do not need a runtime > system, it is probably misleading to say that because there is a pragma > Pure, a package needs no runtime environment (whatever is meant by the > term). I didn't mean to say that; I do understand that in order to have a package without a runtime environment, first of all the package's functionality must not need one. > A good place to look for an answer is the compiler documentation. For > GNAT, you will find sections about creating DLLs in Ada (and shared > libraries). In particular, there is "Binding with Non-Ada Main Programs". That'll give me something to read... thanks for the hint. > ObjectAda allows the creation of DLLs as well. Is my impression correct that there's no free implementation of ObjectAda? -- Viele Gr��e, Thomas