From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: 103376,c35edbbda4c7f58f X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: g2news1.google.com!news4.google.com!news.glorb.com!fr.ip.ndsoftware.net!194.168.222.134.MISMATCH!news-out.ntli.net!newsrout1-gui.ntli.net!ntli.net!newspeer1-win.ntli.net!newsfe5-win.ntli.net.POSTED!53ab2750!not-for-mail From: "Dr. Adrian Wrigley" Subject: Re: Conditional compilation in Ada? User-Agent: Pan/0.14.2 (This is not a psychotic episode. It's a cleansing moment of clarity.) Message-Id: Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada References: <419b5ff6$0$25329$9b4e6d93@newsread2.arcor-online.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Date: Sat, 20 Nov 2004 01:05:01 GMT NNTP-Posting-Host: 81.100.88.147 X-Complaints-To: http://www.ntlworld.com/netreport X-Trace: newsfe5-win.ntli.net 1100912701 81.100.88.147 (Sat, 20 Nov 2004 01:05:01 GMT) NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 20 Nov 2004 01:05:01 GMT Organization: ntl Cablemodem News Service Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:6294 Date: 2004-11-20T01:05:01+00:00 List-Id: > pragma Ignore ( -- compiler warning > DEBUG.put_line > ( "Here " & Is.Something ("reasonable complex to evaluate") > ) > ); Maybe I'm being stupid, but how does this help? Doesn't this always have no effect? I'd like to switch debugging on/off without editing every DEBUG statement in the source... -- Adrian