From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: 103376,24411eb4ff030f6c X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: g2news1.google.com!news2.google.com!proxad.net!newsfeed.tpinternet.pl!atlantis.news.tpi.pl!news.tpi.pl!not-for-mail From: Wojtek Narczynski Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Semantics of Inline vs non-Inline Date: Thu, 21 Oct 2004 22:57:01 +0200 Organization: tp.internet - http://www.tpi.pl/ Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: avf234.neoplus.adsl.tpnet.pl Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: atlantis.news.tpi.pl 1098392251 22709 83.27.39.234 (21 Oct 2004 20:57:31 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@tpi.pl NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 21 Oct 2004 20:57:31 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: Pan/0.14.2 (This is not a psychotic episode. It's a cleansing moment of clarity.) Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:5595 Date: 2004-10-21T22:57:01+02:00 List-Id: >> "13/1 A representation or operational item that is not supported by the >> implementation is illegal, or raises an exception at run time." > > OK, I stand corrected. But didn't you say your procedure, when inlined, > produced an exception (and worked when not inlined)? I am not the original poster, the original poster claims the program 'crashes'. Regards, Wojtek