From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: 103376,ce896fd16cf323ae X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: g2news1.google.com!news1.google.com!news.glorb.com!news.zanker.org!nntp.idg.pl!newsfeed.gazeta.pl!news.onet.pl!newsfeed.tpinternet.pl!atlantis.news.tpi.pl!news.tpi.pl!not-for-mail From: Wojtek Narczynski Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Enumeration representation enhancement proposal Date: Wed, 20 Oct 2004 13:04:58 +0200 Organization: tp.internet - http://www.tpi.pl/ Message-ID: References: <2t7sd8F1rsqh9U1@uni-berlin.de> NNTP-Posting-Host: avl124.neoplus.adsl.tpnet.pl Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: atlantis.news.tpi.pl 1098270328 4033 83.27.45.124 (20 Oct 2004 11:05:28 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@tpi.pl NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 20 Oct 2004 11:05:28 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: Pan/0.14.2 (This is not a psychotic episode. It's a cleansing moment of clarity.) Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:5511 Date: 2004-10-20T13:04:58+02:00 List-Id: Hello, >> Clearly, representation has no impact on comparison. > > Wrong. > Is not correct Ada. The LRM clearly states (can't remember where, > though) that the order of the representation should be the same as > that of the original declaration of the enumeration. You are right, I am wrong. I suppose I've never run into this, because I've used enum rep very rarely, because it is not very useful... I don't have an idea on how to fix it well, then. Thanks taking taking the time to explain me. Regards, Wojtek