From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: 103376,4ef4bf3098ab117
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
Path: 
 g2news1.google.com!news2.google.com!proxad.net!news2.telebyte.nl!border2.nntp.ams.giganews.com!border1.nntp.ams.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!news-hub.cableinet.net!blueyonder!peer-uk.news.demon.net!kibo.news.demon.net!news.demon.co.uk!demon!not-for-mail
From: "Luke A. Guest" <laguest@n_o_p_o_r_k_a_n_d_h_a_m.abyss2.demon.co.uk>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Ada compiler differences
Date: Tue, 19 Oct 2004 21:52:06 +0100
Message-ID: 
 <pan.2004.10.19.20.52.05.922782@n_o_p_o_r_k_a_n_d_h_a_m.abyss2.demon.co.uk>
References: <dac02c02.0410180447.1a4ed08b@posting.google.com>
 <rls1xfwdt0x.fsf@jacob.crs4.it>
 <pan.2004.10.18.18.31.36.895210@n_o_p_o_r_k_a_n_d_h_a_m.abyss2.demon.co.uk>
 <2tild3F20plpeU1@uni-berlin.de>
NNTP-Posting-Host: abyss2.demon.co.uk
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Trace: news.demon.co.uk 1098219126 25799 62.49.62.197 (19 Oct 2004 20:52:06
 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: abuse@demon.net
NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 19 Oct 2004 20:52:06 +0000 (UTC)
User-Agent: Pan/0.14.2 (This is not a psychotic episode. It's a cleansing
 moment of clarity.)
Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:5474
Date: 2004-10-19T21:52:06+01:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

On Mon, 18 Oct 2004 20:55:15 +0100, Nick Roberts wrote:

> Luke A. Guest wrote:
> 
>> Yeah, you'll need to define your own types, but surely these are going
>> to be "derived" from the default types, i.e.
>> 
>>   type Chutney is new Integer range 1 .. 5;
>> 
>> Are you saying not to even do this?
> 
> Yes. Normally it is better to simply put:
> 
>    type Chutney is range 1..5;
> 
> and allow the implementation to select the best base type.

Even if you use a use clause to specify how many bits you want it to take
up (i.e. even in a record)?

Thanks,
Luke.