From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: 103376,c68551ab190372c8 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: g2news1.google.com!news2.google.com!proxad.net!news.wiretrip.org!border2.nntp.ams.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!mephistopheles.news.clara.net!news.clara.net!echo.uk.clara.net From: Stephen Thomas Subject: Re: Ada memory management? Date: Thu, 07 Oct 2004 13:01:06 +0100 User-Agent: Pan/0.14.2.91 (As She Crawled Across the Table (Debian GNU/Linux)) Message-Id: Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Complaints-To: abuse@clara.net (please include full headers) X-Trace: 86870089214224003d0a392226600031d88070005a48c120a180700841653345 NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 07 Oct 2004 13:15:01 +0100 Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:4869 Date: 2004-10-07T13:01:06+01:00 List-Id: On Thu, 07 Oct 2004 13:15:58 +0200, Christoph Karl Walter Grein wrote: > RM 13.11(17) If Storage_Pool is not specified ... then the implementation chooses a standard storage pool .. in an implementation-defined manner. > > So how do you arrive at this statement? > > But see RM 13.11(18): The case is different if a Storage_Size is defined. Because if clause RM13.11(17) holds in a particular case, the implementation may choose to behave as if *it* had selected appropriate S'Storage_Pool and/or S'Storage_Size, and then behave as per RM13.11(18). Or it may not choose to do that, it is up to the implementation. Stephen -- Your name is being called by sacred things That are not addressed nor listened to. Sometimes they blow trumpets.