From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: 103376,985762be6fa32f22 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: g2news1.google.com!news1.google.com!news.glorb.com!newsfeed00.sul.t-online.de!t-online.de!kibo.news.demon.net!news.demon.co.uk!demon!not-for-mail From: "Luke A. Guest" Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Improving Ada's Image Date: Sat, 26 Jun 2004 12:32:26 +0100 Message-ID: References: <2k06c5F16ql15U2@uni-berlin.de> <2k50gdF17acumU1@uni-berlin.de> NNTP-Posting-Host: abyss2.demon.co.uk Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: news.demon.co.uk 1088249546 13189 62.49.62.197 (26 Jun 2004 11:32:26 GMT) X-Complaints-To: abuse@demon.net NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 26 Jun 2004 11:32:26 +0000 (UTC) To: "Nick Roberts" User-Agent: Pan/0.14.2 (This is not a psychotic episode. It's a cleansing moment of clarity.) Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:1916 Date: 2004-06-26T12:32:26+01:00 List-Id: On Sat, 26 Jun 2004 11:12:28 +0100, Nick Roberts wrote: > I can only talk about the projected design of AdaOS, which is still of > course vapourware at this time, and whose ultimate overall security design Just a quick question, but are you considering using exception handling within your AdaOS? I was going to leave it out of mine. I have GNAT compiled for my targets, but they don't have the runtime - without porting effort - so I decided to use a cut down Ada subset. Luke.