From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,7a27b8f727dd1e47 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public Path: controlnews3.google.com!news1.google.com!news.glorb.com!news.agarik.com!news.agarik.com!usenet-fr.net!proxad.net!feeder2-1.proxad.net!news2-e.free.fr!not-for-mail From: JCS Subject: Re: GNAT and no runtime Date: Wed, 26 May 2004 19:42:13 +0200 User-Agent: Pan/0.14.2 (This is not a psychotic episode. It's a cleansing moment of clarity. (Debian GNU/Linux)) Message-ID: Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Organization: Guest of ProXad - France NNTP-Posting-Date: 26 May 2004 19:42:20 MEST NNTP-Posting-Host: 217.108.100.178 X-Trace: 1085593340 news2-e.free.fr 21572 217.108.100.178:3875 X-Complaints-To: abuse@proxad.net Xref: controlnews3.google.com comp.lang.ada:861 Date: 2004-05-26T19:42:20+02:00 List-Id: On Wed, 26 May 2004 11:44:58 -0500, sk wrote: > Visit > > http://www.ktc.com/~sknipe > > for a complete bootable GNAT build kernel. Useless > since all it does is say hello and halts the > processor; however, it does show a possible combination > of pragma No_Run_Time and related settings which should > get you where you want to go. Nope, I looked the document, but there is nothing useful to me, I'm already after this point. I've even more complex functions and a better building process. The author use the "pragma Supress (All_Checks)" and don't raise exception so obviously there is no such problem than I have. But a real OS made in Ada should use the builtin checks and generate exception handling code, at least during the development stage. Cheers, JC