From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,dfe4d35139d584ca X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2004-04-15 15:14:54 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!news.glorb.com!newsrout1.ntli.net!news.ntli.net!newspeer1-win.server.ntli.net!newsfe5-gui.server.ntli.net.POSTED!53ab2750!not-for-mail From: "Dr. Adrian Wrigley" Subject: Re: [Announcement] New Project: GLADE for GNAT User-Agent: Pan/0.14.2 (This is not a psychotic episode. It's a cleansing moment of clarity.) Message-Id: Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada References: <180170243.7y8tCnocqN@linux1.krischik.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Date: Thu, 15 Apr 2004 23:14:53 +0100 NNTP-Posting-Host: 81.100.88.147 X-Complaints-To: abuse@ntlworld.com X-Trace: newsfe5-gui.server.ntli.net 1082067280 81.100.88.147 (Thu, 15 Apr 2004 22:14:40 GMT) NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 15 Apr 2004 22:14:40 GMT Organization: ntl Cablemodem News Service Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:7173 Date: 2004-04-15T23:14:53+01:00 List-Id: On Sat, 03 Apr 2004 13:13:14 +0200, Martin Krischik wrote: > I like to announce the beginning of a new Project. > > The projekt whiches to providing an up to date implementations of Annex E > (Distributed Systems) for GNAT. How does this relate to the ACT GLADE releases? If ACT are working with their own sources, fixing bugs for paying customers, providing them with wavefront releases, won't the "Sourceforge GLADE" always be out of date? Every time a new release is made by the original authors, you will have to integrate their changes. And will it be possible to take the project in a new direction without the sources diverging, giving a permanent split? I am a constant user of GLADE, but have encountered a major bug. Under certain (common) circumstances, failure of one partition can cause the whole program to lock-up - even when the appropriate options are specified in the build. I have not been able to get hold of a wavefront release where this is (said to be) fixed. (all this on versions 3.15p, Intel Linux). Does anyone know how I can get hold of a more recent GLADE for 3.15p? Good luck with the project though! I'd love to see more people using the technology, which beats the alternatives by a long way (in terms of ease of use and flexibility). -- Adrian Wrigley, Cambridge, UK.