From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,5bef5e9c5bedc675
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2004-01-02 11:46:46 PST
Path: 
 archiver1.google.com!news2.google.com!newsfeed2.dallas1.level3.net!news.level3.com!crtntx1-snh1.gtei.net!chcgil2-snh1.gtei.net!news.bbnplanet.com!nycmny1-snf1.gtei.net!news.gtei.net!colt.net!kibo.news.demon.net!news.demon.co.uk!demon!not-for-mail
From: "Luke A. Guest" <laguest@n_o_p_o_r_k_a_n_d_h_a_m.abyss2.demon.co.uk>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: [No_Elaboration_Code] GNAT still generating rep_to_pos, why?
Date: Fri, 02 Jan 2004 19:46:45 +0000
Message-ID: 
 <pan.2004.01.02.19.46.44.889031@n_o_p_o_r_k_a_n_d_h_a_m.abyss2.demon.co.uk>
References: 
 <pan.2004.01.02.11.59.01.594976@n_o_p_o_r_k_a_n_d_h_a_m.abyss2.demon.co.uk>
 <mailman.200.1073065943.31149.comp.lang.ada@ada-france.org>
 <pan.2004.01.02.18.14.48.347041@n_o_p_o_r_k_a_n_d_h_a_m.abyss2.demon.co.uk>
 <mailman.202.1073071924.31149.comp.lang.ada@ada-france.org>
NNTP-Posting-Host: abyss2.demon.co.uk
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Trace: news.demon.co.uk 1073072805 14679 62.49.62.197 (2 Jan 2004 19:46:45
 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: abuse@demon.net
NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 2 Jan 2004 19:46:45 +0000 (UTC)
User-Agent: Pan/0.14.0 (I'm Being Nibbled to Death by Cats!)
Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:4046
Date: 2004-01-02T19:46:45+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

On Fri, 02 Jan 2004 20:31:53 +0100, Per Sandberg wrote:

> To avoid elaboration code is quite simple, just write all your packages 
> in such a way that no elaboration code is needed.
> 
> The simplest way to make this hapend is to add
> 	"pragma pure"

Can't use pure because this package has access types and an instance of a
record type.

> or
> 	"pragma preelaborate"
> in all your specs.
> Then the compiler will force you to write the code in suh a way that no 
> elaboration code is needed.

I tried this one, but the that code is still generated.

Thanks,
Luke.