From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,967a201c4428b348 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2004-01-01 14:01:19 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!news2.google.com!news.maxwell.syr.edu!newsfeed.icl.net!newsfeed.fjserv.net!diablo.theplanet.net!kibo.news.demon.net!news.demon.co.uk!demon!not-for-mail From: "Luke A. Guest" Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Enumeration representation Date: Thu, 01 Jan 2004 22:01:19 +0000 Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: abyss2.demon.co.uk Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: news.demon.co.uk 1072994479 4180 62.49.62.197 (1 Jan 2004 22:01:19 GMT) X-Complaints-To: abuse@demon.net NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 1 Jan 2004 22:01:19 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: Pan/0.14.0 (I'm Being Nibbled to Death by Cats!) Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:4023 Date: 2004-01-01T22:01:19+00:00 List-Id: On Thu, 01 Jan 2004 16:45:28 -0500, Stephen Leake wrote: >> Is this implementation dependent? > > In the absence of a representation clause, the representation in RAM > is technically implementation dependent, but it's extremely > likely to be the same as the position number. Hmm, ok. Is there a representation clause that tells the compiler to start at a particular value? I looked, but couldn't see it. Having to define every enumeration twice could be a pain. Thanks, Luke.