From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,85adbf2c85d62e36 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2003-11-02 11:11:59 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!news2.google.com!news.maxwell.syr.edu!wn14feed!worldnet.att.net!204.127.198.203!attbi_feed3!attbi_feed4!attbi.com!attbi_s54.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Freejack Subject: Re: More Florist. Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Message-ID: References: User-Agent: Pan/0.11.4 (Unix) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Comment-To: "Jeff C," NNTP-Posting-Host: 12.245.85.50 X-Complaints-To: abuse@comcast.net X-Trace: attbi_s54 1067800318 12.245.85.50 (Sun, 02 Nov 2003 19:11:58 GMT) NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 02 Nov 2003 19:11:58 GMT Organization: Comcast Online Date: Sun, 02 Nov 2003 19:11:58 GMT Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:1932 Date: 2003-11-02T19:11:58+00:00 List-Id: On Sun, 02 Nov 2003 13:25:39 -0500, Jeff C, wrote: > Well..It is following the POSIX standard so if there is a problem it is > in the standard and (probably) not the implementation. > > Up until now we (I) have been answering your question directly without > knowing what your final goals are. > Perhaps you would be happier using the AdaSockets. I find it a lot > easier to use and more "Ada like" v.s. the POSIX binding. > > http://www.rfc1149.net/devel/adasockets > > Of course if there is some reason you have to use florist then this is > not the right choice. I have been using Adasockets in the past. My goal right now is just to get familiar with Florist. Adasockets is easier...but I also wanna know Florist. But thanks for the help. I think I just about got it figured out. I'll post up my answer once it works. Freejack