From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,e429176c9adb07b X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2003-02-16 13:25:03 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!logbridge.uoregon.edu!arclight.uoregon.edu!newsfeed.cs.utexas.edu!geraldo.cc.utexas.edu!not-for-mail From: "Bobby D. Bryant" Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: [OT] Best way to isolate a GUI? Date: Sun, 16 Feb 2003 15:24:14 -0600 Organization: dis- Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: dial-41-16.ots.utexas.edu Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: geraldo.cc.utexas.edu 1045430655 4474 128.83.111.208 (16 Feb 2003 21:24:15 GMT) X-Complaints-To: abuse@utexas.edu NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 16 Feb 2003 21:24:15 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: Pan/0.13.3 (That cat's something I can't explain) Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:34160 Date: 2003-02-16T15:24:14-06:00 List-Id: On Sun, 16 Feb 2003 11:19:34 +0100, Jano wrote: > as for my (lately) frequent questions, you may be aware I'm starting a > new project in Ada. Well, the matter is that I want the core > functionality to be isolated from the GUI. And that's the question: > how's the best mean to do that. Whatever else you do, try it on a tiny project first. -- Bobby Bryant Austin, Texas