From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,3a9b49a9162025eb X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2003-02-16 02:16:03 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!newsmi-us.news.garr.it!NewsITBone-GARR!news.mailgate.org!newsfeed.stueberl.de!newsfeed01.sul.t-online.de!newsmm00.sul.t-online.com!t-online.de!news.t-online.com!not-for-mail From: "Martin Krischik" Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Bye-bye Ada ? (Ada95 Wholesale Changes?) Date: Sat, 15 Feb 2003 12:56:11 +0100 Organization: never organized Message-ID: References: <3E3B7BB5.A1A070@adaworks.com> <3NY_9.9226$x63.6255@nwrddc01.gnilink.net> <3E40A07A.CD174746@adaworks.com> <1044457651.769640@master.nyc.kbcfp.com> <3E42A61C.20905@cogeco.ca> <3E432DD4.7F256C85@adaworks.com> <3E43FA31.9873C5AA@adaworks.com> <3E44A869.DDB2352@adaworks.com> <1045157252.719611@master.nyc.kbcfp.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 X-Trace: news.t-online.com 1045390554 06 8694 OnhhE2XTTQANvy 030216 10:15:54 X-Complaints-To: abuse@t-online.com X-Sender: 05341395658-0001@t-dialin.net User-Agent: Pan/0.13.0 (The whole remains beautiful) Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:34146 Date: 2003-02-15T12:56:11+01:00 List-Id: On Thu, 13 Feb 2003 12:27:32 +0000, Hyman Rosen wrote: > Martin Krischik wrote: >> In fact you can't do this if you want virtual inlines. > > Incorrect as well. You can have a virtual inline with the > definition in the class: > struct a { virtual void foo() { } }; I tried that. The compiler won't say a thing - but the linker will be more then upset. I might uf cource be dependen on the compiler. > This is totally wrong - you really should learn more C++ > if you are going to make pronouncements about it. Inline > functions don't require any separate definitions for being > called indirectly, whether through the virtual table or by > having their address taken. The compiler takes care of that. I have 7 Years practical experience programming C++ - programming 8 hours a day. But prehaps this discussiun shows less about yours and my experience but more about the fact that no two C++ compilers are the same. With Regards Martin -- Martin Krischik mailto://Martin@krischik.com http://www.krischik.com