From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,71c41b6f4d72158c X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2002-07-15 01:36:30 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!news-spur1.maxwell.syr.edu!news.maxwell.syr.edu!newsfeed.stueberl.de!newsfeed.freenet.de!news.freenet.de!not-for-mail From: Jan Prazak Subject: Re: if X in 1..35000 versus Boolean Date: Mon, 15 Jul 2002 10:36:57 -0100 Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Message-ID: References: User-Agent: Pan/0.11.2 (Unix) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso885915 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Comment-To: "Gautier direct_replies_not_read" NNTP-Posting-Host: 213.7.198.186 X-Trace: 1026722143 news.freenet.de 23709 213.7.198.186 X-Complaints-To: abuse@freenet.de Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:27101 Date: 2002-07-15T10:36:57-01:00 List-Id: On Sun, 14 Jul 2002 19:22:26 -0100, Gautier direct_replies_not_read wrote: > Did you test your Pascal assumptions ?... At least I get under Turbo > Pascal 6 and Delphi 6, for > > program test; type t1234 = (1,2,3,4); begin end. > ^ > Identifier expected. No, I didn't test it. It has been I while ago since I was programming, and I use enumeration types very rarely, so don't wonder if you get an error message :)