From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,319c841368a8705a X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2002-07-08 12:59:12 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!news-spur1.maxwell.syr.edu!news.maxwell.syr.edu!newsfeed.icl.net!newsfeed.fjserv.net!newsfeed.freenet.de!news.freenet.de!not-for-mail From: Jan Prazak Subject: Re: float problem Date: Mon, 08 Jul 2002 22:00:05 -0100 Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Message-ID: References: User-Agent: Pan/0.11.2 (Unix) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso885915 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Comment-To: "Jan Prazak" NNTP-Posting-Host: 213.7.143.55 X-Trace: 1026158350 news.freenet.de 15168 213.7.143.55 X-Complaints-To: abuse@freenet.de Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:26948 Date: 2002-07-08T22:00:05-01:00 List-Id: OK, thanks to all. Now I remember that there is also a way in Pascal to define the precision in procedure "write", similar to the "Aft" variable in Ada. So probably the result would be the same in Pascal. So put(f, Aft => 6); is the thing a wanted, just to see the (more) precise value. Jan