From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: 103376,21960280f1d61e84
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
Path: 
 g2news2.google.com!news3.google.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!local01.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.megapath.net!news.megapath.net.POSTED!not-for-mail
NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 26 Jan 2007 21:53:40 -0600
From: "Randy Brukardt" <randy@rrsoftware.com>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
References: <1169531612.200010.153120@38g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>
 <1169588206.234714.312650@k78g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>
 <nospam-4CB856.14335024012007@news.west.earthlink.net>
 <egYth.15026$w91.10597@newsread1.news.pas.earthlink.net>
 <Jfauh.240347$aJ.979@attbi_s21>
Subject: Re: How come Ada isn't more popular?
Date: Fri, 26 Jan 2007 21:54:57 -0600
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1807
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1807
Message-ID: <paCdnUfB87dYUSfYnZ2dnUVZ_t-mnZ2d@megapath.net>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 64.32.209.38
X-Trace: 
 sv3-fKpFuwHojtQxgylth2Y/pTwk+tvSQfF8E9jSVqQMip/06mGmJGjDZVPMzxCc5GdQw3VBvo3SEN7AU86!OFwnJ6bahRCjH8rN3TxAzfjyzlec5LBeh7xxlVMP3Af/dKF1G9iiR9m0SsgiK1TQe/GW/aB7oY+u!17EZWRmlwbXiFA==
X-Complaints-To: abuse@megapath.net
X-DMCA-Complaints-To: abuse@megapath.net
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint
 properly
X-Postfilter: 1.3.32
Xref: g2news2.google.com comp.lang.ada:8614
Date: 2007-01-26T21:54:57-06:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

"Jeffrey R. Carter" <jrcarter@acm.org> wrote in message
news:Jfauh.240347$aJ.979@attbi_s21...
...
> Hopefully 2007 will see Ada 0X become a standard. On the Ada-comment
> mailing list there's a discussion of revising the wording for
> "equivalence" for ordered containers (originally discussed on c.l.a), so
> it may be a while yet.

Those sorts of bugs will go in a corrigendum or amendment to come down the
road.

The Amendment completed its last approval stage (the JTC1 vote) this week.
(There is a press release in preparation.) The only remaining task is for
the Amendment to be officially published. Can't say how long that will take,
but we now know that there won't be any substantial changes to it.

                        Randy Brukardt.