From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 Path: eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!border1.nntp.ams1.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!peer03.ams1!peer.ams1.xlned.com!news.xlned.com!peer03.am4!peer.am4.highwinds-media.com!peer02.fr7!futter-mich.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!fx40.am4.POSTED!not-for-mail Subject: Re: State of the compiler market Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada References: From: Per Sandberg User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.7.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: X-Complaints-To: abuse@usenet.se NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 24 Feb 2017 09:23:33 UTC Organization: usenet.se Date: Fri, 24 Feb 2017 10:23:33 +0100 X-Received-Bytes: 1706 X-Received-Body-CRC: 2389743786 X-Original-Bytes: 1756 Xref: news.eternal-september.org comp.lang.ada:33394 Date: 2017-02-24T10:23:33+01:00 List-Id: Could agree on that but a fair question is: How many real compiler-vendors are there fo C and C++? A "real" vendor is a vendor using a complete different code-base for the compiler, not just branding or forking gcc. /Per Den 2017-02-23 kl. 19:03, skrev Jeffrey R. Carter: > On 02/23/2017 01:26 AM, john@mccabe.org.uk wrote: >> >> I have honestly been searching on Google for this, but I can't easily >> find out who produces a commercial (or free) compiler for Ada 2012, >> other than AdaCore. Can anyone give me some pointers please? > > It's a sad but true fact that AdaCore is the only company producing an > Ada-12 compiler. > >> I've looked at some compilers I've used in the past but they seem to >> have stagnated around Ada 95. > > In 2000, about half of the compiler vendors offered compilers for > ISO/IEC 8652:2007. There are probably fewer vendors now, and about the > same number of compilers, so that proportion has probably gone up. >