From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FORGED_GMAIL_RCVD, FREEMAIL_FROM autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 Path: eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!news.fcku.it!peer01.fr7!futter-mich.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!fx33.am4.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Spiros Bousbouras Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: How to deal with Ada libraries? Message-ID: References: In-Reply-To: X-Organisation: Weyland-Yutani Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Complaints-To: http://netreport.virginmedia.com NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 29 Oct 2017 18:53:48 UTC Organization: virginmedia.com Date: Sun, 29 Oct 2017 18:53:48 GMT X-Received-Bytes: 1621 X-Received-Body-CRC: 1001156529 Xref: news.eternal-september.org comp.lang.ada:48636 Date: 2017-10-29T18:53:48+00:00 List-Id: On Sun, 29 Oct 2017 20:12:45 +0200 Victor Porton wrote: > I decided to use Dmitry A. Kazakov's Simple Components library in my big > serious project (which is to contain a command line utility and a HTTP(S) > proxy server). Is your project something which will be running on your own computers or is it something that users will download and compile on their own computer ? > I am to choose of three variants: > > 1. create a Makefile to build the Simple Components library and link to this > library; > > 2. don't create a library but just include Dmitry's files as a part of my > source; > > 3. just install the Debian package built by Dmitry. > > The "3" variant has the deficiency that because the Dmitry's package is not > in Debian, this may cause difficulty in the future to make my own Debian > package of my software. What does it take to get a package accepted to the official Debian distribution ? > Please help me to choose the best variant.