From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,6cc2d0131145e263 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2001-08-10 14:43:53 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!newsfeed.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!news-spur1.maxwell.syr.edu!news.maxwell.syr.edu!howland.erols.net!panix!nycmny1-snh1.gtei.net!chcgil2-snf1.gtei.net!news.gtei.net!news.binc.net!kilgallen From: Kilgallen@eisner.decus.org.nospam (Larry Kilgallen) Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Question about "for X'Size use ..." Date: 10 Aug 2001 16:43:50 -0500 Organization: LJK Software Message-ID: References: <3B72C23E.62F7B3D2@san.rr.com> <87ofpnzmpj.fsf@deneb.enyo.de> NNTP-Posting-Host: eisner.encompasserve.org X-Trace: grandcanyon.binc.net 997479320 19348 192.135.80.34 (10 Aug 2001 21:35:20 GMT) X-Complaints-To: abuse@binc.net NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 10 Aug 2001 21:35:20 +0000 (UTC) Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:11784 Date: 2001-08-10T16:43:50-05:00 List-Id: In article <87ofpnzmpj.fsf@deneb.enyo.de>, Florian Weimer writes: > Probably. I'm still a bit irritated because people are dealing with > such issues and do not tackle the more eminent problem of specifying > the byte/octet order for discrete types (both in-memory representation > and stream I/O layout). That's what I like about ASN.1. I don't know XDR.