From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, PP_MIME_FAKE_ASCII_TEXT autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII X-Google-Thread: 10261c,2dc0a43481058921 X-Google-Attributes: gid10261c,public X-Google-Thread: fb992,2dc0a43481058921 X-Google-Attributes: gidfb992,public X-Google-Thread: 114809,2dc0a43481058921 X-Google-Attributes: gid114809,public X-Google-Thread: 103376,2dc0a43481058921 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2001-01-07 20:47:59 PST Path: supernews.google.com!sn-xit-02!supernews.com!news.gv.tsc.tdk.com!falcon.america.net!sunqbc.risq.qc.ca!news.maxwell.syr.edu!intgwpad.nntp.telstra.net!news-server.bigpond.net.au!not-for-mail From: "Vortex Vandel" Newsgroups: comp.lang.smalltalk,comp.lang.visual.basic,comp.lang.pascal.misc,comp.lang.ada References: <93a584$n84$1@nnrp1.deja.com> <3A58AFF3.C67CAB11@bigfoot.de> Subject: Re: ANNOUNCE: Free-NET X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4522.1200 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4522.1200 Message-ID: Date: Mon, 08 Jan 2001 04:50:29 GMT NNTP-Posting-Host: 144.132.66.135 X-Complaints-To: news@bigpond.net.au X-Trace: news-server.bigpond.net.au 978929429 144.132.66.135 (Mon, 08 Jan 2001 15:50:29 EST) NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 08 Jan 2001 15:50:29 EST Organization: BigPond Internet Services (http://www.bigpond.net.au) Xref: supernews.google.com comp.lang.smalltalk:6007 comp.lang.visual.basic:1048 comp.lang.pascal.misc:1091 comp.lang.ada:3761 Date: 2001-01-08T04:50:29+00:00 List-Id: "Gerhard H�ring" wrote in message news:3A58AFF3.C67CAB11@bigfoot.de... > Yes, but how does this have anything to do with Microsoft .NET? > Interfacing different languages via a message queue thru stdin/stdout? I > do not understand how you can compare that with Microsoft's .NET > technology. The core of .NET is the Common Language Runtime, and there > is already a competitor for this: it's called the Java platform :-) > Please elaborate on how you plan to implement a .NET equivalent. This looks really dumb (or is it just me?) why can't you use the commands with out giveing them to some server? is this a really dodgy multi threading with out multi threadding?(sort of the art of fighting with out fighting? :) also what is this .net crud that is the "new" buzzword.. some one mentioned it.. and I can't remember what he said :) some thing about a new message que to replace interprocess communications or some thing? but it's for multi computers or some thing?