From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 Path: eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!nntp-feed.chiark.greenend.org.uk!ewrotcd!newsfeed.xs3.de!io.xs3.de!news.jacob-sparre.dk!franka.jacob-sparre.dk!pnx.dk!.POSTED.rrsoftware.com!not-for-mail From: "Randy Brukardt" Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Ada-Oriented GUI Date: Fri, 23 Mar 2018 17:59:13 -0500 Organization: JSA Research & Innovation Message-ID: References: <7789c58e-ca36-44a2-8818-009eface4a3e@googlegroups.com> <926b83eb-6cce-417d-9c17-df6be2bc98d5@googlegroups.com> <2d1f392f-e747-42aa-8938-d6538d5b9934@googlegroups.com> <7e240e01-f6e2-40dc-a7da-d430d1c92f67@googlegroups.com> <3ff0cd7d-c3c5-4b03-a686-3cb21f3fbfa6@googlegroups.com> <748d6aa7-3d37-43e4-a38c-5e852b54b915@googlegroups.com> Injection-Date: Fri, 23 Mar 2018 22:59:14 -0000 (UTC) Injection-Info: franka.jacob-sparre.dk; posting-host="rrsoftware.com:24.196.82.226"; logging-data="14719"; mail-complaints-to="news@jacob-sparre.dk" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.5931 X-RFC2646: Format=Flowed; Original X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.7246 Xref: reader02.eternal-september.org comp.lang.ada:51186 Date: 2018-03-23T17:59:13-05:00 List-Id: "Shark8" wrote in message news:748d6aa7-3d37-43e4-a38c-5e852b54b915@googlegroups.com... > On Wednesday, March 21, 2018 at 4:40:32 PM UTC-6, Randy Brukardt wrote: >> >> This is a long-winded way of saying that you should submit it, there's >> some >> chance it might be acted on but it's hard to say how much. > > I sent an email to arg(at)ada-auth.org; subject: "Re: AI12-0205-1 > (Defaults for generic formal parameters)" > > (a) Was that the correct procedure? It's OK, since you're an observer and thus subject to the "designated experts" deadlines. You could have sent it to Ada-Comment as well. > (b) Was the AI the proper one? I was thinking of AI12-0215-1 "Implicit Instantiations", but AI12-0205-1 works as well. Since you're an observer, it might end up as a new AI as well. > (c) Did you receive the e-mail? Yes, I saw it, and I think it went out to everyone. Randy.