From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00
	autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
Path: 
 eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!nntp-feed.chiark.greenend.org.uk!ewrotcd!newsfeed.xs3.de!io.xs3.de!news.jacob-sparre.dk!franka.jacob-sparre.dk!pnx.dk!.POSTED.rrsoftware.com!not-for-mail
From: "Randy Brukardt" <randy@rrsoftware.com>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: little precision about anonymous access types
Date: Mon, 19 Mar 2018 17:40:36 -0500
Organization: JSA Research & Innovation
Message-ID: <p8pe94$3pv$1@franka.jacob-sparre.dk>
References: <edf7b96a-f340-408c-994f-d5aa73b9f2db@googlegroups.com>
Injection-Date: Mon, 19 Mar 2018 22:40:37 -0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: franka.jacob-sparre.dk;
 posting-host="rrsoftware.com:24.196.82.226";
	logging-data="3903"; mail-complaints-to="news@jacob-sparre.dk"
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.5931
X-RFC2646: Format=Flowed; Original
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.7246
Xref: reader02.eternal-september.org comp.lang.ada:51077
Date: 2018-03-19T17:40:36-05:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

"Mehdi Saada" <00120260a@gmail.com> wrote in message 
news:edf7b96a-f340-408c-994f-d5aa73b9f2db@googlegroups.com...
>I have a little question about (anonymous) access types:

There are several different kinds of anonymous access types, all with 
different semantics in details. The best possible advice is to not use them 
at all, since they're more likely to be confusing than useful. If you follow 
that advice, you don't have to worry about differing details. :-)

                    Randy.