From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 Path: eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: G. B. Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: "functional" programming in Ada Date: Thu, 8 Mar 2018 18:24:17 -0000 (UTC) Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Message-ID: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Date: Thu, 8 Mar 2018 18:24:17 -0000 (UTC) Injection-Info: reader02.eternal-september.org; posting-host="218e7cb22af581791549c275c9386c54"; logging-data="12059"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+GI9733f1pn3Zc4vdCJJFThGIfkBJj2no=" User-Agent: NewsTap/5.3.1 (iPhone/iPod Touch) Cancel-Lock: sha1:081mKItSmy8pj4+Mgfn4u+HudgY= sha1:tUH/lEuyl1KFK5bZH1Q1WgWKwvg= Xref: reader02.eternal-september.org comp.lang.ada:50898 Date: 2018-03-08T18:24:17+00:00 List-Id: Alejandro R. Mosteo wrote: > I've found myself > trying to force an expression function just to avoid a package body. > > Care to share your experiences? It all breaks down when I need to “see” the computation, like when tracing.