From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 Path: eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: "Jeffrey R. Carter" Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: "functional" programming in Ada Date: Tue, 6 Mar 2018 17:26:52 +0100 Organization: Also freenews.netfront.net; news.tornevall.net; news.eternal-september.org Message-ID: References: <83978b21-9384-4b04-a16d-37ce06488800@googlegroups.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Date: Tue, 6 Mar 2018 16:26:52 -0000 (UTC) Injection-Info: reader02.eternal-september.org; posting-host="4963e779f241cc41916b6a6c8e858e5b"; logging-data="15306"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+q87Cxf3pshwTbyO9MsLYSBZu4Xa0V1d0=" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.6.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Language: en-US Cancel-Lock: sha1:aMB6//aYhfGLnjtK190GVrvQzVk= Xref: reader02.eternal-september.org comp.lang.ada:50850 Date: 2018-03-06T17:26:52+01:00 List-Id: On 03/06/2018 03:36 PM, Mehdi Saada wrote: >> From a compiler writer POV I may understand it for the same reasons we >> have the private part in the spec. > How come ? Why should the compiler handle those functions differently than normal functions whose body is forbidden to be anywhere else than in the package body ? According to the Ada-12 Rationale, expression functions were added to help with contracts. -- Jeff Carter "He that hath no beard is less than a man." Much Ado About Nothing 132