From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 Path: eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!aioe.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: "J-P. Rosen" Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: body stub not allowed in inner scope Date: Thu, 1 Mar 2018 08:14:34 +0100 Organization: Adalog Message-ID: References: <55cd79f5-4b37-4b08-b292-073ed2f37021@googlegroups.com> <15c49c4e-726a-4fd7-bf35-c7d27ff9a491@googlegroups.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: TKk5kT01+2w6guVcOjcsiQ.user.gioia.aioe.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Complaints-To: abuse@aioe.org User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.6.0 X-Notice: Filtered by postfilter v. 0.8.3 Content-Language: fr Xref: reader02.eternal-september.org comp.lang.ada:50731 Date: 2018-03-01T08:14:34+01:00 List-Id: Le 01/03/2018 à 00:23, Randy Brukardt a écrit : > "Mehdi Saada" <00120260a@gmail.com> wrote in message > news:15c49c4e-726a-4fd7-bf35-c7d27ff9a491@googlegroups.com... >> Thanks. >> But that's ugly... How about fixing this for the next norm ? > > Does anyone other than ACATS tests actually use stubs these days? Why? (We > used to use them extensively, but only because Janus/Ada on 16-bit MS-DOS > limited a single unit to 64K of generated code -- and our editors couldn't > handle more than 256K of source code at a time. None of that makes sense > today.) At least for task and protected bodies, which can't be child units. Also, stubs have visibility to elements in the parent's body, although I agree that direct visibility of global elements should be limited. -- J-P. Rosen Adalog 2 rue du Docteur Lombard, 92441 Issy-les-Moulineaux CEDEX Tel: +33 1 45 29 21 52, Fax: +33 1 45 29 25 00 http://www.adalog.fr