From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 Path: eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!aioe.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: "Dmitry A. Kazakov" Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: non-local pointer cannot point to local object Date: Fri, 23 Feb 2018 10:42:44 +0100 Organization: Aioe.org NNTP Server Message-ID: References: <15e8a72b-3644-4193-8947-b0aaf587c1c2@googlegroups.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: MyFhHs417jM9AgzRpXn7yg.user.gioia.aioe.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Complaints-To: abuse@aioe.org User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.6.0 X-Notice: Filtered by postfilter v. 0.8.3 Content-Language: en-US Xref: reader02.eternal-september.org comp.lang.ada:50591 Date: 2018-02-23T10:42:44+01:00 List-Id: On 23/02/2018 09:54, artium@nihamkin.com wrote: > Can someone explain why I get "non-local pointer cannot point to > local object" error, even though it looks like "Arr" and "Arr_Access" > have the same accessibility level? In the equation are the type of pointer and the target object, not two objects. > Can I overcome the problem without dynamically allocating memory and without using "Unchecked_Access"? You probably don't need char_array_access. char_array is meant to be used where C expects char *. Just pass To_C ("from") right to C. -- Regards, Dmitry A. Kazakov http://www.dmitry-kazakov.de