From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 Path: eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!aioe.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: "Dmitry A. Kazakov" Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Formal Subprogram Access Date: Wed, 14 Feb 2018 09:19:45 +0100 Organization: Aioe.org NNTP Server Message-ID: References: <22dc19b9-ed5f-464a-bd56-87bd9e16c23a@googlegroups.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: MyFhHs417jM9AgzRpXn7yg.user.gioia.aioe.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Complaints-To: abuse@aioe.org User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.6.0 X-Notice: Filtered by postfilter v. 0.8.3 Content-Language: en-US Xref: reader02.eternal-september.org comp.lang.ada:50441 Date: 2018-02-14T09:19:45+01:00 List-Id: On 14/02/2018 01:47, Randy Brukardt wrote: > But a better solution in general is to avoid 'Access altogether -- then you > don't need a panel of experts to argue about whether it is legal or not. ;-) Yeah, and when Ada will get subprogram types finally? The only reason for 'Access here is to pass a subprogram as an argument! -- Regards, Dmitry A. Kazakov http://www.dmitry-kazakov.de