From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 Path: eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: "Alejandro R. Mosteo" Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: interfaces and limited/controlled/limited-controlled types Date: Fri, 26 Jan 2018 12:17:29 +0100 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Message-ID: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Date: Fri, 26 Jan 2018 11:17:30 -0000 (UTC) Injection-Info: reader02.eternal-september.org; posting-host="5ca1a45ca47851aacf17019e526d1e22"; logging-data="12446"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+t2ThRIMxjjWLGSf7/VaLG" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.5.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Language: en-US Cancel-Lock: sha1:fW4mauQ2VJBBW68dIjAwEAwipQc= Xref: reader02.eternal-september.org comp.lang.ada:50163 Date: 2018-01-26T12:17:29+01:00 List-Id: On 26/01/18 09:28, Dmitry A. Kazakov wrote: > On 26/01/2018 05:58, Randy Brukardt wrote: >> "Mehdi Saada" <00120260a@gmail.com> wrote in message >> news:ea190839-2f83-4dbb-9064-8d6f535cc1d0@googlegroups.com... >>> (...) > However having an ability to add finalization > later would be an indispensable feature. Existing workarounds are not > good at all. Agreed. > BTW, was it considered to add new interfaces without making existing > base types members of? I just was lamenting myself recently for not recalling this idea for the next revision. Just add new interfaces with the same semantics. I wonder if there are technical problems besides having a duplicated feature. -Alex.