From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00
	autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
Path: 
 eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: "Jeffrey R. Carter" <spam.jrcarter.not@spam.not.acm.org>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: stopping a loop iteration without exiting it
Date: Mon, 8 Jan 2018 23:35:28 +0100
Organization: Also freenews.netfront.net; news.tornevall.net;
 news.eternal-september.org
Message-ID: <p30rnh$bjk$1@dont-email.me>
References: <bc57c2d8-ed05-4e8b-b7db-440984976364@googlegroups.com>
 <81971548-23c9-4927-a6a8-6f0f1dba896b@googlegroups.com>
 <p2jhdl$da4$1@franka.jacob-sparre.dk> <wccr2r6ttuh.fsf@TheWorld.com>
 <p2kufi$f1l$1@dont-email.me> <p2l1kr$11p4$1@gioia.aioe.org>
 <wccd12p4das.fsf@TheWorld.com> <p2m5m0$16p3$1@gioia.aioe.org>
 <fb7qfdFnt9dU1@mid.individual.net> <p2ndih$pmk$1@gioia.aioe.org>
 <fbcd2cFpmrhU1@mid.individual.net> <p2r0h8$9qr$1@gioia.aioe.org>
 <p30m0j$h1i$1@franka.jacob-sparre.dk>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Mon, 8 Jan 2018 22:35:29 -0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: reader02.eternal-september.org;
 posting-host="1a7b0ae9a477e99ffcde6258202601cd";
	logging-data="11892"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";
	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+aHyeDfgfNHdgQyt2krL8gcuSfGUgdIMk="
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/52.5.0
In-Reply-To: <p30m0j$h1i$1@franka.jacob-sparre.dk>
Content-Language: en-US
Cancel-Lock: sha1:B98AZzLhQaVjCFaS4C/NzTQb8nc=
Xref: reader02.eternal-september.org comp.lang.ada:49821
Date: 2018-01-08T23:35:28+01:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

On 01/08/2018 09:57 PM, Randy Brukardt wrote:
> "Dmitry A. Kazakov" <mailbox@dmitry-kazakov.de> wrote in message
> news:p2r0h8$9qr$1@gioia.aioe.org...
> ...
>> I am afraid that would fall under the category "too simple to be
>> approved", together with "raise when", "return when", "goto when".
> 
> As usual in these cases, no one has asked. It's probably more of a case of
> "too simple to bother asking for".  And if you don't ask, there is
> absolutely no chance because it isn't on the ARG's radar.

I asked for it once during a prior revision cycle. It was rejected. Doesn't seem 
to be any point in asking again.

-- 
Jeff Carter
"You can never forget too much about C++."
115