From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00
	autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
Path: 
 eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!aioe.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: "Dmitry A. Kazakov" <mailbox@dmitry-kazakov.de>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: stopping a loop iteration without exiting it
Date: Mon, 8 Jan 2018 09:35:39 +0100
Organization: Aioe.org NNTP Server
Message-ID: <p2vagt$f3t$1@gioia.aioe.org>
References: <bc57c2d8-ed05-4e8b-b7db-440984976364@googlegroups.com>
 <81971548-23c9-4927-a6a8-6f0f1dba896b@googlegroups.com>
 <p2jhdl$da4$1@franka.jacob-sparre.dk> <wccr2r6ttuh.fsf@TheWorld.com>
 <p2kufi$f1l$1@dont-email.me> <p2l1kr$11p4$1@gioia.aioe.org>
 <wccd12p4das.fsf@TheWorld.com> <p2m5m0$16p3$1@gioia.aioe.org>
 <fb7qfdFnt9dU1@mid.individual.net> <p2ndih$pmk$1@gioia.aioe.org>
 <fbcd2cFpmrhU1@mid.individual.net> <p2r0h8$9qr$1@gioia.aioe.org>
 <fbef1uF9clvU1@mid.individual.net> <p2t2ei$19gb$1@gioia.aioe.org>
 <fbfhdfFhgebU1@mid.individual.net>
NNTP-Posting-Host: cfcJERb/54nsSDewC8aKwg.user.gioia.aioe.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Complaints-To: abuse@aioe.org
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/52.5.2
Content-Language: en-US
X-Notice: Filtered by postfilter v. 0.8.2
Xref: reader02.eternal-september.org comp.lang.ada:49809
Date: 2018-01-08T09:35:39+01:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

On 2018-01-07 22:22, Niklas Holsti wrote:
> On 18-01-07 14:05 , Dmitry A. Kazakov wrote:

>> If S is a descendant of T then in order to build a case you have
>> to spell choices like:
>>
>>    when T..S'Parent =>
>>    when S'Class =>
>>
>> X in T..S'Parent = X in T'Class and X not in S'Class and T in S'Class.
> 
> Yes, but I think your formula has a mistake. You assume that S is a 
> descendant of T, but the formula requires that T is in S'Class, which 
> under your assumption happens only if S = T. Perhaps you meant "S in 
> T'Class"?

Yes, S in T'Class.

-- 
Regards,
Dmitry A. Kazakov
http://www.dmitry-kazakov.de