From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 Path: eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!nntp-feed.chiark.greenend.org.uk!ewrotcd!newsfeed.xs3.de!io.xs3.de!news.jacob-sparre.dk!franka.jacob-sparre.dk!pnx.dk!.POSTED.rrsoftware.com!not-for-mail From: "Randy Brukardt" Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Return by reference Date: Mon, 18 Dec 2017 16:33:18 -0600 Organization: JSA Research & Innovation Message-ID: References: Injection-Date: Mon, 18 Dec 2017 22:33:19 -0000 (UTC) Injection-Info: franka.jacob-sparre.dk; posting-host="rrsoftware.com:24.196.82.226"; logging-data="20321"; mail-complaints-to="news@jacob-sparre.dk" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.5931 X-RFC2646: Format=Flowed; Original X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.7246 Xref: reader02.eternal-september.org comp.lang.ada:49523 Date: 2017-12-18T16:33:18-06:00 List-Id: "Jere" wrote in message news:a94cf715-a4a4-42bb-8800-9bb6a8baf9ac@googlegroups.com... ... > I was wondering if Ada could take a step with it further > and provide a syntax for return by reference. No. It doesn't semantically make sense as a stand-alone concept. We tried a whole bunch of ideas on that line before giving up and adopting the implicit dereference mechanism. Randy.