From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 Path: eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: G. B. Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: I am leaving Ada :-( because of GNAT bugs Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2017 08:03:46 -0000 (UTC) Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Message-ID: References: <51c86026-b814-45b4-9c3e-33d25ef17e44@googlegroups.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2017 08:03:46 -0000 (UTC) Injection-Info: reader02.eternal-september.org; posting-host="61934b9c1e6e1cee9f52709737c5c979"; logging-data="28784"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+EW7OC+0StPkFJ4ZVr8Fle+1U1bqFcyFU=" User-Agent: NewsTap/5.3.1 (iPhone/iPod Touch) Cancel-Lock: sha1:fEWxIjYyonMkChlYW1/ETBeXYY4= sha1:kY+BDwk1lgdPezY9aNWQntGlS58= Xref: reader02.eternal-september.org comp.lang.ada:49467 Date: 2017-12-13T08:03:46+00:00 List-Id: Mehdi Saada <00120260a@gmail.com> wrote: > generics ? Compiling generics is troublesome ? When Dmitry says something about generics, he has been implying their use for emulating static polymorphism and as a replacement for generic types. A narrow perspective on generics and pushing them to limits that require substantial amounts of training in order to still follow. Just Ada generics failing would have put AdaCore out of business in no time, and other vendors, too. Given that this is not the case, you might see the remark in a different light.